Waamax

“A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, and die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.” – Robert A. Heinlein

I never realized I talk about connecting dots more than a normal man does. A friend of mine made me aware of that. The startling question he posed was ‘Do MBAs have a fetish for connecting dots?’
Well I was like ‘Excuse me’. That’s an over generalization and I was never aware I was using that word so frequently. Well it’s nothing about sounding stylish, classy or sexy at all. It’s just a desire to know the truth. But as in life every things depends on your perception. When I told one of my MBA friend about my interests of moving towards consultancy, his only remark was ‘Wow consultancy sounds so sexy’. Duh?

But the thing here is about knowing the gaps and articulating facts and information so that it makes sense. And my nature says, either you have the full picture or there is no picture at all. It bugs me up big time when I can’t figure out the relation between things that matters to me. Two of my friends, one in China and one here in US were sharing comments in facebook and I had no freaking idea how they both know each other. Of course they never talk to me about each other. Now that bugs me up. And for me, to find out how they know each other is connecting the dots. There are numerous such scenarios everyday.

So Basically for me its more of a curiosity to know the truth rather than sounding stylish or sexy. And yeah, I have a fetish for knowing the truth.

The process of using wide ranging and interacting data to understand processes, problems, and solutions. The opposite of one factor at a time (OFAT), where ones natural born tendency is to change one factor and “see” what happens. Statistical thinking is the tendency to want to understand complete situational understanding over a wide range of data where several control factors may be interacting at once to produce and outcome. Common cause variation becomes your friend and special cause variation your enemy. Attribute judgements of good and bad are replaced with estimates of significance with given confidence.

src: isixsigma

More to come on this….

To her who was careful on putting her money in the bank, does not take risks, and does not borrow more than she can pay back comfortably — if everyone had this mindset we might have escaped the mess we are at now

To everyone - Now that mindset won’t help us get out of this mess

You know about exams. I mean who doesn’t. I can’t remember how many exams I have taken till this age. But one thing has never changed. The dread.

I just took the stats exam today and I was all cool just before the start. I have read all the material pretty well and was confident enough to crack even the toughest probability nuts. But see. After exactly 75 minutes later I found myself all wrong. I was splashed by a bucket of freezing water just to remind how wrong I was. Needless to say I screwed up the exam.

So what’s the catch? Are exams always meant to be that way? Well one good thing about all these repetitive experiences is that, they warn you of your complacency. In a sense they will always charge you up with the feeling of insecurity or feeling of being a beginner again. That reminds you of facing the unexpected, facing the chaos or broadly facing the real world.

And you know the best thing about exam? No matter how much you screw up the last one, they always keep on coming. I better catch it next time.

Regardless of what we discover, we understand and truly believe that everyone did the best job they could, given what they knew at the time, their skills and abilities, the resources available, and the situation at hand.

From Norman Kerth, Project Retrospectives

5 minutes from my finance class ( September 8 )

As the wall street figures starts climbing everybody seems to be in a rush to get the bigger piece of the pie. And everybody is rushing even more to claim the credit of economic recovery. So this issue “U.S. economy gets lift from stimulus” dated Sep 9 on wall street journal talks on the economy stabilizing and regaining from the brink, and analyzes different stimulus and plans that were put together on overcoming the greatest financial crisis since the great depression.

Some economists argue that it was because of the Bush administration that provided the recovery to this crisis. Some argue that it was due to the federal reserve’s aggressively buying of Treasury debt and mortgage backed securities. Some said that it was due to the stimulus packages and programs like ‘cash for clunkers’ under Obama’s administration that ignited the recent recovery.

To give a better picture to the scenario my finance professor described the following analogy:

A teen was speeding on his Ferrari on a highway at an amazing (unbelievable) speed when he met an accident. When he crashed with such a speed he broke all his bones and damaged all his organs and was in the brink of saying his final goodbye. Somehow he managed to still be alive. But with such severity and critical condition nothing could be said just yet. At the hospital the experts were bemused when they saw this case. It was nothing even close to anything they have ever seen. Nothing was working and nobody had any idea on where to start and which body part to focus on. So each expert tried out his own way on the patient. Each one tried completely different tactics and methods to the injured boy.

Now after about couple of months, the boy seems to show some sign of progress. Now each expert wants to be the first one to claim that it was his method that was responsible for the recovery.

This scenario depicts today’s situation on global economic progress.

Recommendation from my professor Dr. Raman Kumar:
As this is a kind of situation where the world economy is in a state no one has ever seen before and no one has any idea on how to precisely save the economy, it’s worthless to argue about whose method was responsible for this slight progress. It’s the time to try all the methods and work from all the possible sectors to save the crashed economy. And to make sure nobody get away with driving the unchecked Ferrari in the future.

Last week my friend Kunal (second year MBA student) recommended this book: Freakonomics. With the economics on the tag and me being not particularly fan of the subject, was skeptical at first. He eased my hesitation by simply focusing on the name. Freakonomics.

Well I gave it a shot.From the introduction alone I was immediately comfortable as this book has nothing to deal with the hard core economics.

Freakonomics
A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything
Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J.Dubner

The authors confess at the very beginning that the book has no central theme. After going through each of the chapters you couldn’t agree more. If there is even a central idea in this book then it could be taken as: If morality represents how people would like the world to work, then economics shows how it actually does work.

The book explores the funny side of life trying to answer some questions that might have interesting and even surprising answers.
The book in super summary from the authors:

1. what do school teachers and sumo wrestlers have in common?

In which we explore the beauty of incentives, as well as their dark side - cheating. who cheats? just about everyone. how cheaters cheat, and how to catch them. stories from an israeli day care center. the sudden disappearance of seven million american children.. cheating school teachers in Chicago.. why cheating to lose is worse than cheating to win.. could sumo wrestling, the national sport of japan, be corrupt? what the Begal man saw: mankind may be more honest than we think.

2. How is the Ku klux Klan like a group of Real Estate Agent?

In which it is argued that nothing is more powerful than information, especially when its power is abused.
Going undercover in the Ku Klux klan.. Why experts of every kind are in the perfect position to exploit you.. The antidote to information abuse:the internet..Why a new car is suddenly worth so much less the moment it leaves the lot… Breaking the real-estate agent code: what “well maintained” really means.. Is Trent Lott more racist than the average weakest link contestant?.. what do online dates lie about?

3. Why do drug dealers still live with their Moms?

In which the conventional wisdom is often found to be a web of fabrication, self interest, and convenience. Why experts routinely make up statistics; the invention of chronic halitosis.. How to ask a
good question.. Sudhir Venkatesh’s long, strange trip into the crack den.. Life is a tournament.. Why prostitutes earn more than architects.. What a drug dealer, a high school quarter back, and an editorial
assistant have in common.. How the invention of crack cocaine mirrored the invention of nylon stockings.. Was crack the worst thing to hit black Americans since Jim Crow?

4. Where have all the criminals gone?

In which the facts of crime are sorted out from the fictions. What Nicolae Ceau? escu learned - the hard way-about abortion.. why the 1960s were a great time to be a criminal.. think the roaring 1990s economy put a crimp on crime?.. Think again.. why capital punishment doesn’t deter criminals.. do police actually lower crime rates?.. prisons, prisons, everywhere.. seeing through the new york city police
“miracle”.. what is a gun really?.. why early crack dealers were like microsoft millionaires and the later crack dealers were like pets.com.. The super predator versus the senior citizen.. Jane Roe, crime stopper: how the legalization of abortion changed everything.

5. What makes a perfect parent?

In which we ask, from a variety of angles, a pressing question: do parents really matter? The conversion of parenting from an art of science.. why parenting experts like to scare parents to death.. which is more dangerous: a gun or a swimming pool?.. the economics of fear.. obsessive parents and the nature-nurture quagmire.. why a good school isn’t as good as you might think.. the black white test gap and “acting white” .. eight things that make a child do better in school and eight that don’t

6. Perfect parenting part II or Would a Roshanda by any other name smell as sweet?

In which we weigh the importance of a parent’s first official act - naming the baby A boy named Winner and his brother, Loser.. the blackest names and the whitest names.. the segregation of culture: why seinfiedl never made the top fifty among the blackand low end names (and how one becomes the
other).. Britney spears: a symptom, not a cause.. is aviva the next madison?.. what your parents were telling the world when they gave you your name.

EPILOGUE: Two paths to Harvard

In which the dependability of data meets the randomness of life.

As you can imagine from this summary, the authors talk on such a diverse terms and ask questions that are funny and grave at the same time. But the answers are all based on real data and it’s fascinating to see how they come to the conclusion and the actual cause.

Needless to say all of the answers you answer (unless you have read this book or you think the way Levitt does) will be wrong.

A highly recommended read.

It really is. I mean do you even care if someone has a 5 star home, earns in 6-7 figures every year and have a dozen of BMW’s in their garage? I don’t even care if someone has grandeur fame or zillions of admirers. I really believe that an earned success is not worth it. How can you be successful when you are buried in your work every second and you have to think even before you breathe?

I really hate to be reminded that I should be working my ass off to be one of these so called “successfuls” in my society. Coz honestly it’s not worth it. When I see these “society claimed successful people”, I feel I couldn’t be more correct.

Business men: These so called Richs live on more than 14 hours work a day, less than 4 hours of sleep in the tyranny of their watch with messed up social life, messed up health and even more messed up family life. Give me a break. What’s the use of your millions when you can’t attend your son’s graduation, daughter’s birthday and your wife loves a man and that’s not you? Forget the friends’ get together and festive social gatherings. Do you even remember your children name? What’s so good about earning so much when you have lost almost everything in the process? What good a job you did when you are called a loner, while you find yourself buried in your enormous wealth which you no longer have time and zeal to spend. Take a deep breath. There’s more to life than earning bucks every second.

PhD doctors: If you have an option of marrying a library you would most probably have been married to a dozen of it. Why do you bury yourself with books all the time and do you know what? You have been sitting your ass off in front of this monitor for 8 hours straight. To find the details that don’t interest anyone, not even you? You go to the depths of such extent just to find that it has almost no practical use. And I too know that you have plagiarized your way through your thesis. Does is make any sense to you? I am not interested in this crap which you have apparently wasted almost all of your life researching on. Tell me how you feel. A “Dr” prefix to your name? Not bad. But all the life’s effort and work just for this? Think again.

Medical doctor: They got name and money and are the so called “life saver”. So what? Are they happy? They die every day while savings others life. Where is the pleasure and zeal in living when you found every day cleaning the wounds of everyone except yours? What’s the use of treating all the strangers while you have sickened all those that matters to you? Do you even realize that your social and family life is far worse than the wound you just cleaned? I wish you know the medicine to heal yourself.

Politicians: Ok just tell me what you do best? Let me tell you. You are best at finding the fault in others and making fool of yourself in the world stage where everyone can easily tell how crap you are. And yeah, you are best at fooling and troubling the people who have elected you. Being in so called top position doesn’t make you a top guy. Somebody has to be there. Unfortunately it happened to be you. It could be anyone or anything. how does it feels to talk crap all year, lavish on the money you don’t even deserve to touch, show the big dreams that you don’t even believe, and trouble the very people who have shown you the faith? Get a life.

Actors: Haha. Do you even act? Oh yeah. You act as if you’re an actor. How can you even be self esteemed to call yourself an “actor”. Stop fooling yourself.

I recently grabbed a Michael Moore documentary DVD “Bowling for Columbine”. Like most of his previous movies, this one is also a real thought provoking one. This movie is primarily concerned about the use of guns and its impact on killings in the United States of America. What’s in the name “Bowling for Columbine“? Moore claims that 2 students, who were involved in the massacre incident in the Columbine High School, went to bowling class at early morning, the day of the massacre. However this particular fact had been controversial as the school claims that those students were absent in the day of killing. But the bigger picture here is about the school homicide that killed a dozen innocent school students.

Moore doesn’t argue about whether it’s right or not to possess guns neither about the gun control measures. He tries to find an answer on what is the reason behind such a large number of gun killings in the country. It’s not just that US has more guns. Comparing to its northern neighbor, Canada too have similar number of guns but the number of killings in US is in astronomical figures. In 2002 alone more than 11,427 people were killed in gun shooting. Moore exploits various sectors to find an answer.

Some Michigan residents state that they have to take care of security themselves. According to some they call 911/police because they have guns. So possess guns yourself and cut off the middle man. Take care of yourself and your family. Moore argues that if having lots of guns the reason for security, then America would be the world’s most secure country. But it’s just the opposite.
Canada has similar number of guns but the number of killings is almost null compared to that of America. Moore even portrays an outline that if you are an American the best thing you can do is to move northwards to Canada for safety, health care, good society etc.

So what exactly is responsible for the exceptionally high level of killing in USA? Not just guns because other countries have guns too. Not just violent history because there are lots of countries which have more violent histories, not just unemployment and not violent movie or video games.
Moore identifies three chief reasons behind the exceptionally high US gun killings.

1) US media: that fans up fear constantly among its citizens.
2) US Government: that solves every problem by bombing everywhere.
3) The US gun culture. Moore pictured it perfectly by receiving a gun for new bank account.

A typical Michael Moore movie which leaves you thinking as the movie ends.

The policymakers are eager to submit Nepal Development Strategy Paper (NDSP) to the donor community on May 15 in order to entice more aid and investment in the economy. The development strategy paper reflects the core economic and political beliefs of the Maoists government. In the next three years, the government aims to attain an average growth rate of 7.6 percent and reduce national poverty level to 21.5 percent. Additionally, it aims to achieve agricultural and non-agricultural growth rate of over five percent and 8.5 percent respectively.

Like in previous cases, these targets are unrealistic and do not reflect the ground economic realities. It seems the policymakers who drafted this paper are ignorant of labor disputes, power cuts, and loss of competitiveness of exportable goods, among other issues. The strategy paper is unclear about how it will help the economy make a transition to new productive activities, leading to production of goods and services that could be exported with comparative advantage.

It is debatable to what extent the agendas should be changed to make NDSP a consensus document and reflective of the current state of the ailing economy. Whatever the ideological orientation of final NDSP would be, given the critical and binding constraints on economic growth, policies that are consistent with the following strategies, in no particular order, would potentially help attain a moderate growth rate in the coming years.

First, given the geographical disadvantage, domestic policies should be synchronized with India’s and China’s economic policies in order to maximize neighborhood growth spillovers. Statistical evidence shows that the faster neighbors grow, the faster the landlocked country will grow. It has been shown that when neighbors grow at an additional one percentage point, growth of landlocked country raises by 0.4 percent. Also, low income countries tend to grow faster if they export goods and services typically exported by countries substantially richer than themselves. However, it is not realized in the case of Nepal because of the absence of critical complementary factors like transport infrastructure, governance, appropriability of returns to investment and ad hoc arbitrary policies that are often in conflict with prior economic objectives.

Second, rather than exclusively focusing on markets in the EU and the US, policies should be designed to maximize trading with our neighbors, India and China—the two emerging giants in the global economy. Tapping the untapped markets along the bordering states, where the transportation costs are low, by producing goods and services that are within the reach of the people residing there would be a fruitful exercise. The Indian state of UP alone presents a huge market of more than 190 million people, which is seven times the total population of Nepal. Some investors are already taking advantage of these markets. For instance, after loss of markets in the US and the EU, Nepali textile and clothing exporters are now looking at the Indian market. The amount of export of textile and clothing to India increased from NRs 365.9 million in 2004/05 to NRs 1137.3 million in 2005/06. Similarly, aligning tourism policies with that of Tibet could turn out to be fruitful and profitable. Additionally, policymakers should seriously work on designing policies that would project Nepal as a transit nation for trade between India and China.

Third, design policies to entice FDI in transport infrastructure and large- and small-scale hydropower projects. The government could substantially ease regulatory structure, ensure security of returns to investment and consistency of hydropower policy, resolve labor disputes, build grids to enhance connectivity and share risks with the private sector, among others. Given high consumption demand and low supply of electricity, hydropower could potentially be the most beneficial and profitable sector for investment. Convincing the donors and the banking industry to focus on large-scale projects and encouraging domestic enterprises and entrepreneurs to invest in small-scale projects could be an appropriate strategy.

Fourth, to give the struggling industrial sector a breathing space so that they can compete in price and quality in the international market, the government should implement the provisions outlined in Investment Board and SEZ ordinances, which were recently passed by the cabinet. Even though the WTO allows low-income countries with weak industrial base to establish SEZs and GPZs, so far this has not materialized due to political bickering, leading to delay in establishing backward and forward linkages in the industrial sector.

Fifth, the government should facilitate foreign investment in the tourism sector. Increasing visibility in the international tourism market, easing of visa restrictions, ensuring security, and, most importantly, improving tourism infrastructure such as road transport, airways, and ICT would help a lot. Note that in the Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Index 2008, Nepal ranks 116 out of 130 countries, which shows the lack of competitiveness of the Nepali tourism industry.

Sixth, the government should also facilitate foreign employment and inflow of remittances. Not much needs to be said about the role of remittances, which already account for almost 20 percent of GDP.

Seventh, the policymakers should not forget that the high population growth rate is also constraining increase in GDP per capita. Either jobs creation in the industrial sector should be rapid enough to outpace the rate at which youths are entering the job market or the government should initiate measures to lower population growth rate.

These strategies are not comprehensive. However, focusing policies on these strategies would help kick-start the growth engine and attain a modest and sustained growth rate.

Chandan Sapkota
sapkotac@dickinson.edu

In the last day of his role as prime minister, the Maoist premier Prachanda claimed that his administration gave “utmost importance to economic transformation” and made “major contribution to economic revolution”. Unlike his boss, former Finance Minister Dr. Baburam Bhattarai was a bit modest in laying claims about economic progress achieved under his leadership. In assessing the economic policies and progress under the Maoist administration, it is unclear how the dismal performance, especially in encouraging private sector and utilizing development expenditures, amounts to or leads to “economic revolution”.

The most successful and significant achievement of the previous administration was to ensure governance and accountability in revenue collection, which increased by 40 percent in the first ten months of the current fiscal year, for which credit goes to Dr. Bhattarai’s policies on taxation. Given the institutional intransience for good governance at customs and government agencies, many people, including myself, were skeptical about revenue targets of Dr. Bhattarai, who, with good leadership and ‘carrot and stick’ approach, was able to beat all pessimistic expectations. Under his leadership, the Inland Revenue Department was more vigilant than ever in curbing leakages, streamlined and cleaned up the mess in the department, and offered extra incentives to customs personnel for better performance.

The other commendable policies initiated by Dr. Bhattarai were loan waiver of heavily indebted farmers and the Youth Self-Employment Program (YSEP). These programs were well-intentioned but the execution was not all that clear. Overall, the huge demand for loans by youths and partial relief received by some of the poorest farmers was worth the policy experimentation.

Not all the program and policies of the previous administration were productive. The drive for more revenue generation and implementation of VDIS led to savings flight as nervous investors and savers searched for safer vaults abroad. While this policy was unpopular in the business community, the government, instead of trying to find a common path, wasted more than three months going head-on-head against the businessmen, whom it saw as “feudalist and bourgeois classes”. At a time when there was a desperate need for normalization of tension between the private sector and the government, this incident led to souring of relationship and fostered distrust between the two.

Fond of making bombastic, populist and unrealistic claims and a tendency to look backwards in the age of globalization, the Maoists government miserably failed in convincing the private sector, foreign investors, and development agencies that their Marxist/socialist model was worth trying. Filled with pompous slogans, socialist ideas and the aim to develop “national capitalism”, Dr. Bhattarai’s budget was not well received by the private sector. They, along with the development agencies, repeatedly asked him to be clear about government’s position on the role of private sector and in general the economic system. Trying to treat private sector and cooperatives in equal footing by bringing Investment Board and Cooperative Board under the Economic Council was probably the most dubious plan. Instead of streamlining of disaggregated economic activities, it led to more chaos and confusion in the industrial sector. Also, the plan to revive moribund, sick industries with the aim of increasing employment and channeling their production for government’s use was a blunder. The drumbeat of double-digit growth rate without assessing ground realities and workable economic policies perplexed people.

The most devastating and counterproductive policies were to let YCL make a mockery of contract enforcement, destabilize the already feeble industrial sector, and turn a deaf ear to dire call for industrial security. By implicitly supporting the activities of its militant cadres, the Maoist administration showed double standards in dealing with the private sector. Some of the Maoist ministers even endorsed and defended the extralegal occupation of industrial districts by YCL cadres, forced donation campaign, and threat to life and property of businessmen, whom they see as ‘feudalists’. The government engaged in multiple rounds of discussion with businessmen but did not budge on the call for disciplining YCL cadres and taming disruptive activities of trade unions. This led to closure of several garment firms, jute mills, and multinational companies, among others. The Maoists administration backtracked only after it was threatened of noncooperation by the opposition parties; it was not because it was responding to the concerns of the private sector.

Later on, the Maoist government was busy cleaning its own mess. Too focused on controlling and finding a way out for its disruptive cadres, it was helpless in supplying the most needed essential services in rural areas. For instance, it was powerless when more than one-third of the population was under the threat of starvation at the height of the global rise in price of food and commodities, and when major forests were on fire. Moreover, the government also did not do enough to manage safe return of IDPs.

With regards to macroeconomic management, the administration’s performance was very disappointing. The price level initially rose above 14 percent due to rise in food, fuel and commodity prices in the global market. However, as prices of these items declined globally, they were too sticky in the Nepali market, leading to inflation rate of above 10 percent. The government was unable to manage shortage of goods, which was created artificially by holding back inventories. The export sector continued to lose its grip in international market and trade deficit is rising. The supply of fuel was severely affected due to frequent closure of the main highway linking the Valley and Terai. The government had to bail out cash-strapped, debt-ridden NOC two times. Still, the nation lacks a plan to close big hole in NOC’s balance sheet. On top of that, there is no immediate plan to bridge the wedge (of 500 MW) between demand for and supply of electricity in the economy. Worse, domestic and foreign investors are not yet convinced of secure investment, rule of law, and respect for property rights in the infrastructure and hydropower sectors.

The Maoists also failed to mobilize development expenditure, leading to very few development programs being implemented—a point even Dr. Bhattarai has conceded. So far, only 27 percent of total capital expenditure has been spent. Meanwhile, achieving the targeted economic growth rate is now a fairy tale!

The economy is far from being transformed. There were some successes in revenue collection and welfare programs. However, there were even more problems– industrial relations deteriorated, allocated development money remained unspent, investors and donors remained skeptical of Maoists policies, price level spiraled upwards, and there was a severe shortage of energy, which further crippled the industrial sector, among others.

Chandan Sapkota

Former finance minster of Nepal Ram Saran Mahat zeros down on growth and Maoist led government’s progress (I largely agree with his assessment)

Their focus was on distribution, not on production. We believe in production. Without creating production and employment opportunities you cannot raise the economic status of the people. They believed that distributing government resources would take care of everything. […] They believe in government intervention even in production and trading. They believe in re-nationalisation.

[…] distribution of wealth takes time, it cannot happen overnight. We could have done better, but even with the type of development we saw in the private sector, the living conditions at the bottom have improved a lot. Look at the real wages in the rural areas. Now it is difficult to get labour for agriculture, the wage rate is very high. Real wages have gone up. If you look at the National Living Standard Survey (NLSS), it shows that the consumption level of people across regions, across ecological bases, of all income groups have increased significantly. Employment opportunities have increased, there is demand for more labour, more employment. So while it is true that market forces increase disparity, it increases the income level of the poor also. To raise the economic status of lower income groups, of course, you need a separate package of economic reforms. More consideration needs to be given to the social sector — health, education, rural development, agriculture.

Even in the early days our development programme, our budget distribution and expenditure pattern, the focus was on creating infrastructure in rural areas. We strongly believed that without basic infrastructure in place — like access roads, electricity, education, basic health services — no matter how much you spend for the downtrodden, it will have no meaning. And infrastructure is not created overnight, it takes time. Now you have started seeing results. Karnali is accessible, you have road links to Kalikot, Jumla. Districts that were not touched by road networks 10-15 years ago now have road access not just in their headquarters but practically in all VDCs. Electricity has reached to far corners of the country. That has helped a lot in improving the status of the common man. Because of improved infrastructure in rural areas, people are now producing for the market. Even from the far corners of Nepal, you see agricultural production coming into the market. So our emphasis was different.

The Maoist-led government failed because they allocated budgeted programmes, ill-conceived, half-baked programmes, without much study. They didn’t allocate funds in well-studied, well-prepared programmes. They allocated huge sums of money without any preparation. But how can you spend money? Of course, there are financial rules and regulations that need to be followed. This is why they couldn’t deliver.

The Maoists also failed miserably on the price front. The irony is that at the international level prices have been declining. Prices decline during a recession. Indian inflation is almost at 0 now. Fuel prices have gone down. But Nepal’s inflation rate is going up. This is because of government mismanagement. There is more purchasing power in the hands of the people without production. Production should go side by side with income. The emphasis on distributive policies leads to easy money in the hands of the people, which leads to inflation. Bandas, hartals, disruptions in the supply chain are also responsible for this.

Chandan Sapkota

One of my dear frens from Syangja, Chandan Sapkota, who just graduated from Dickinson College with Economics major will be contributing his valuable thoughts and articles to waamax.com. He is mainly interested in development economics, especially on economic growth, public policy, trade and development.

It’s always a good thing to present as varied articles as possible. Stay tuned for the articles on those fronts.

This week “Bing” has become a buzz word after Microsoft unveiled its new approach to challenge Google. Well changing name doesn’t hurt that much.

But as the history suggests, “bing” isn’t a word Microsoft will opt to for its one of the elite services. When I digged in a little further I found what it really meant.

Bing will evoke neither a type of cherry nor a strip club on “The Sopranos” but rather a sound — the ringing of a bell that signals the “aha” moment when a search leads to an answer.
The name is meant to conjure “the sound of found” as Bing helps people with complex tasks.

Well Bills Gates would be a happy man if people would start “Binging” things in future. Till then continue “Googling” it.

Honestly I have been observing this for quite a while now. Facebook being exponentially popular by the day, it’s inevitable that nothing gets untouched and football is no exception. This trend has happened in almost all the times (pre & post football games) and is more prominent during the big games.

Here’s what I observed about the facebook status changes according to the football games:

My public speaking class at British council concluded recently. It was only a 16 hours course but there were so many things to learn. I will be writing on this experience on few topics. To begin with, here is public speaking 101.

public speaking 101 - Speech Layout

One of the most important attributes of great speech is its organization in the structure. As with most of the things, organized things are well taken by the audience and it serves the purpose better.

A well structured speech has the following part in the given order:
Greetings, name, position
Good morning. my name is (…..). I’m the new finance manager.
Ladies and gentlemen. It’s an honor to have the opportunity to address such a distinguished audience
Good morning. let me start by saying just a few words about my own background. i started out in…
welcome to standard electronics. i know I’ve met some of you, but just for the benefit of those i haven’t, my name is ….

Title/subject
i’d like to talk (to you) today about..
i’m going to present the recent …/explain our position on../brief you on../inform you about../describe..
The subject/focus/topic of my talk/presentation/paper (academic)/speech(usually to the pubic audience)

Purpose/Objective
we are here today to |decide../agree../learn about..
the purpose of this talk is to |update you on../put you in the picture about../give you the background to..
this talk is designed to |act as a springboard for discussion../start the ball rolling..

Length
i shall only take (..) minutes of your time
i plan to brief
this should only last (…) minutes

Outline/Main parts
i’ve divided my presentation into four parts/sections. they are..
the subject can be looked at under the following heading…
we can break this area down into the following fields:
firstly/first of all..
secondly/then/next..
thirdly/and then we come to..
finally/lastly/last of all..

Questions
i’d be glad to answer any questions at the end of my talk
if you have any questions, please feel free to interrupt
please interrupt me if there’s something which needs clarifying. otherwise, there will be time for discussion at the end

Reference to the Audience
i can see many of you are..
i know you’ve all traveled a long way
you all look as though you’ve heard this before

Main Body
explain the content on the points you outlined above in the same order
follow the explanation in the way in which audience can figure out the next approach

Summarize
after completing the main body explanation summarize the main outline point once again

Concluding
end your talk/speech in a high note with something significant that leaves and lasting impressions on your audience
thanks the audience

Questions
as promised at the beginning ask for audience questions

Thank
Thank your audience for being the part of this talk
end your note with a smile

I was playing with my new CDMA handy set on April 14 2009 (Nepali New Year 2066) when I got this sms from NTC (Nepali Telecom).

“wishing you a New Year 2065 filled with renewed hope, joy & happiness” - Nepal Telecom

Now how poor is that? The mere purpose of wising a new year with the correct year wasn’t even fulfilled. I don’t care about the hope, joy, happiness blah blah blah. I would be more than pleased if it was simply Happy New Year 2066. I would have been satisfied with no sms at all.

Well it seems NTC is never satisfied without making those little blunders.

I would just take this opportunity to wish you all ‘Happy New Year 2066′

Pay-Per-Click campaign is a fabulous way for online Internet marketing. But running ads on Google adwords and being successful can be very complicated and time consuming process. These methods are very error prone and can cost your dearly if not done properly.

Common Adwords mistake could be:

1. Having only single adgroup in your campaign:
Google doesn’t favor the lack of differentiation. Infact the primary thing Google loves is to give its users the best online search experience. This means the ads should be much targeted along with its keywords.

Single ad group means, all the keywords direct to the same ad-copy. This signifies that the keywords in the ad group are not strongly related. So the way to beat this is by placing highly relevant keywords in an ad group and ad copy that perfectly matches the ad group.

2. Keywords not optimized:
keywords that produce sales/conversions need to be regularly optimized and expanded. The maximum cpc (cost-per-click) bids needs to be revised so that your keywords are always competitive. Continuous monitoring of the keywords and the results should also be marked with the change in the ad copy too. Split testing could help you to achieve both. Aim for more targeted keyword and the ad copy which would results in the better quality score, low cpc and higher sales.

3. Google analytics not set up or set up poorly:
In order to get the best results out of your Ad words campaigns and your website, you really should be using Google’s Analytics tool. It is free and probably the best way to manage your online marketing as it provides a detailed and clear picture of what your website visitors are actually doing while visiting your website.

There are many things you can do with Analytics to improve results, but generally speaking what Analytics does is it allows you to see the factors that directly result in enquiries and sales. This means you know what works so you can replicate, and what doesn’t work so you can eliminate it.

4. Website not optimized:
After all the hard work in optimizing and managing the keywords, ad group and ad copy it would be fruitless if you lack the better landing page or website. All these efforts should be back up with an excellent website that gets those sales.

Your landing page should be very relevant to your keywords and your ad copy for the prospects to convert into sales. Highly targeted and relevant landing page is rewarded by Google quality score which in turn works in favor or your successful PPC (pay-per-click) campaign.

Of course, doing all this can be very tiring, complicated and time consuming. But so does the rest of the things if you want to be the best.

Happy Cranking!

This one is one of my personal favorites. But the song meaning is once again, ambiguous and differs on the interpreter. We have various versions on the meaning of the same song.

Here it goes:

This is about a man who no longer recognizes himself and feels awful about it.

Some lyrical analysis: “We passed upon the stair” is a figurative representation of a crossroads in Bowie’s life, where Ziggy Stardust catches a glimpse of his former self, (being David Bowie) which he thought had died a long time ago. Then he (the old David Bowie) says: “Oh no, not me. I never lost control.” This indicates that Bowie never really lost sight of who he was, but he Sold The World (made them believe) that he had become Ziggy, and he thought it was funny (I laughed and shook his hand). He goes on to state, “For years and years I roamed,” which could refer to touring. “Gaze a gazely stare at all the millions here” are the fans at concerts.

i never lost control…and he was right , he control us until today, kurt cobain and his great cover of this great song , lyrics full of mesterious meaning but in the same it s about this man who is a special one , man with a special vision of this world , man who know the truth about it , it s why he sold it and he got away from it , to his own world , i really loved this song and i think that kurt is the bets one who sang this title with his feeling , and he did it , he sold our world in 1994 , and we miss him .

I see this song as the dialogue between the image we create in public and for which we believe is the true ourself (in the song denoted as He) and real, internal ourself created probably in our childhood (in song denoted as I) . That He, usually thinks is the same as I (that is why the lyrics “We never lost control,Youre face to face,With the man who sold the world” in the second verse).That is of course an illusion (that is why the internal, real us says “He said I was his friend, which came as a surprise”). Real us is of course looking for a form to show up in the public image throughout our lives(the whole third verse is just about that). And the difference between Bowie and Curt comes in the fourth verse. In Bowie version is after all We that never lost control (I assume he thinks that one can at least try to be as close to true ourself as one can be, shifting forms, but never being exactly that). On contrary Curt says it is an I that never lost the control, sounding like we can never be in our everyday lives what we really are (we forever betray our true nature). And for me, I am closer to Curts opinion. Sorry if I complicated things, but it is the way I feel this song, which is for me one of the best ever written in the popular music.

Actually I think the song is about religion and how it relates to independent thinking and how that is controlled by religion. In the first verse “the man” means any religious icon, whether it be Christ, Mohammed, Budda, etc ect… They are all men who “sold” the world on their ideas. Then at the last verse Bowie states that there are “millions” of religious icons, meaning everyone, but how we see someone as a religious icon all depends on control of that thought. This song is brilliant, and why this song is constantly attributed to Kurt Cobain is beyond me. Kurt Cobain never got even close to writing this good.

The Man who sold the world could actually be Judas Iscariot , Cane , the Devil or a wandering lost soul. We passed upon the stair, we spoke of was and when - Judas & Jesus meet sometime in the future and discussed about the past and what happened. (They were friends once. remember?) Although I wasn’t there, he said I was his friend - although Judas was not up there in heaven(upstairs) he was surprised that Jesus still considers him as His friend. Which came as some surprise I spoke into his eyes:”I thought you died alone, a long long time ago” - Judas thought Jesus died alone in the past. Oh no, not me I never lost control You’re face to face With the man who sold the world - not sure who spoke this. I laughed and shook his hand, and made my way back home - Judas goes back home to sheol/hell/limbo?. (not exactly sure why he laughed. maybe sarcastic or just let out a devilish laugh.) I searched for form and land, for years and years I roamed - Judas was probably cursed to wander aimlessly in another dimension or in limbo looking for form and land (similar to cane’s curse if u read the Bible). I gazed a gazely stare at all the millions here We must have died along, a long long time ago - Judas looks at millions of tormented souls in hell or limbo and told them they are already dead along with him ( they must have thought theyre alive all along ) Who knows? not me We never lost control You’re face to face With the man who sold the world - Judas talking to the multitude and admitted he’s the man who sold the world. Listen closely at bowie’s version at the end of the song theres a kind of eerie back vocals. spooky. but it rocks. you can download it using winmx. but its hard to find. goodluck.

I honestly think this song is about drugs, drugs abuse and what it does to your life. He walked along a stairs to meet up with his former self, although his former self is no longer around. And he’s surprised how much he liked his former self but he is gone (dead a long time ago) And no I didn’t lose control would be a kind of denial that they never did to much or wasn’t an addict etc. The second verse could be about all the fun druggie trips he took. He laughed at the idea of hallucinating seeing himself, then he gazed a gazely stair would be him being stone….. then realizing that his old self died a long time ago but his old self and currents self didn’t lose control they were only using recreationally or whatever you want to call it. And the man who sold the world could be code for drugs and the euphoric feels it gives you. Maybe I’m way off my rocker but that’s how I see it.

Interesting interpritations here. To me, the song is about a guy living the typical 9 to 5 life and meeting up with an old man/bum that hung around in the neighborhood and eventualy disapeared. He suddenly reappears and after exchanging sentiments he realised that the old man was content, while he was not. His “Searching” was for that same contentment. He then realizes that he was dead to the world becuase of his material pusuits. IE; Dying alone. The idea of “The Man who Sold the World” is one that gave up all things material and found bliss.

I believe this is about one person and appears to be about a suicide. One line reads, “Oh no, not me, I never lost control.” At the end, it reads, “Oh no, not me, WE never lost control. You’re face to face With the Man who Sold the World.” In other words, the man who sold the world is himself. I’ll guess that “we passed along the stair” is about the stairway to heaven or hell. This appears to be about a man remembering himself in the past (the man he passes is himself) and believing that he did not kill himself, was heading up to heaven. He is so convinced that he did not die from suicide, he splits himself into two people and is “surprised” that the man on the stair was his “friend.” However, he does know that the man on the stair, a man that he is surprised to find out was his friend, DIED a long, long time ago. How would he know that if he doesn’t know the man? In other words, “Hey, I thought you died but hey, I’m not you; I’m not that man.” He laughs at the phrase, “You’re face to face with the Man who sold the world,” and continues on to heaven. Notice how it reads, “I searched for form and land.” There is nothing around him except air and he’s walking in nothingness. Ultimately, after many years he finds all the people who have committed suicide (in hell, I guess) and realizes that there are millions who died alone, just like him. But even to the end, when he realizes that the man on the stair was himself, he tries to convince himself that WE never lost control, even though he gave up everything.

In my opinion, this song is about a man who doesn’t want to be famous or popular anymore and he’s sick and tired of the people who admire and adore him and he wants to go away and start a new life. So he runs away, and sets up a scene as though he committed suicide and years and years later…one of his best friends finds him and is completely surprised because his friend thougt that “he died a long long time ago”. And then he says, “Oh no, not me, I never lost control.” He sold the entire world to a complete lie…a setup of a suicide/murder. That’s why i think that it’s possible that kurt cobain is still alive hiding somewhere.

Well it’s upto you to agree on any of the versions. If you have your own, let’s hear it.

song facts from (songfacts)